Parliament Research Paper on EA's 4/6/21

Post Reply
User avatar
monkeynuts
Site Admin
Posts: 146
Joined: 07 Nov 2012 13:46
Location: Macclesfield

Parliament Research Paper on EA's 4/6/21

Post by monkeynuts »

There is information we are well aware of in here, but there are good nuggets of info:

I particularly like the explanation in para 4.4 about forced entry. It is extremely clear on what the proceed is and throws away this locksmith myth they tend to use so blatantly.
SN04103.pdf
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
On the path to become an 'activist lawyer'

Welfare advisor at national charity

An awake populous is a bailiffs worst nightmare
zeke
Posts: 244
Joined: 30 Jul 2012 21:23

Re: Parliament Research Paper on EA's 4/6/21

Post by zeke »

It was punted around last month and an error was spotted in 4.4.

once bailiffs have been let into a property, they have a right to enter again.
User avatar
monkeynuts
Site Admin
Posts: 146
Joined: 07 Nov 2012 13:46
Location: Macclesfield

Re: Parliament Research Paper on EA's 4/6/21

Post by monkeynuts »

That was amended, the last para covers it.
On the path to become an 'activist lawyer'

Welfare advisor at national charity

An awake populous is a bailiffs worst nightmare
User avatar
Syd Snitkin
The Watcher
Posts: 171
Joined: 28 Apr 2014 09:43
Location: In your loft, waiting

Re: Parliament Research Paper on EA's 4/6/21

Post by Syd Snitkin »

Although the last sentence clarifies when they can use for to re-enter, it's still saying "once bailiffs have been let into a property, they have the right to eneter again", which implies that's whether a CGA is in place or not. Without a CGA they surely cannot have the 'right' to re-enter?
Former General Manager of a nursing home, trained in music and classical guitar, MBA in contract law, expert legal commentator on bailiff law. enjoys PG tips. No not me, some screwball elsewhere
zeke
Posts: 244
Joined: 30 Jul 2012 21:23

Re: Parliament Research Paper on EA's 4/6/21

Post by zeke »

Counsel for a debtor pointed that out. The regulations don't provide for it,
Post Reply